Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1381

reference
194-tree-1
name
1381
tree-preservation-order

undefined

194-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.031448 50.865177)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.031391 50.865171,-1.031394 50.865182,-1.031402 50.865192,-1.031414 50.865200,-1.031430 50.865205,-1.031447 50.865207,-1.031465 50.865206,-1.031481 50.865201,-1.031493 50.865193,-1.031502 50.865183,-1.031505 50.865172,-1.031502 50.865161,-1.031494 50.865151,-1.031482 50.865143,-1.031466 50.865137,-1.031449 50.865135,-1.031431 50.865137,-1.031415 50.865142,-1.031402 50.865150,-1.031394 50.865160,-1.031391 50.865171)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL